The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] A question for OSPF-TE
Hi Louis, For your information, - http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-venkatachalam-ospf-traffic-02.txt - http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dharanikota-interarea-te-ext-02.txt were submitted for the last IETF meeting (SLC). Regards, - dimitri. Louis Yun wrote: > > Cheng-hong, > > You can think of the Opaque LSA used for traffic engineering as a natural > extension of the regular OSPF router-LSA. Just like router-LSAs, then, > OSPF-TE LSAs have area-only scope for scalability reasons. In fact, > scalability is an even more critical issue for traffic engineering > applications, since any change in link bandwidth or other attributes -- not > only the link going up or down -- will cause the LSA to be reflooded. > > One may attempt breaking down the problem of inter-area path calculation > into per area computations, but it's not so simple. Suppose the Ingress of > a TE tunnel is in a different area then the Egress, and you are trying to > compute a CSPF route. There may be multiple exit ABRs within the Ingress > area. There's no way to know beforehand whether a particular exit ABR leads > to the best path, or will even satisfy the path constraints in the > subsequent areas. The result -- you may have to check all exit ABRs, > raising questions as to how well these computations would scale. > draft-kompella-mpls-multiarea-te-01.txt gives a good discussion about this. > In essence, there's a tradeoff between protocol scalability and optimality > of the computed TE path for a tunnel. > > What is needed is an extension of the OSPF summary LSA for inter-area TE > advertisements. Something like this has in fact been proposed; see > draft-venkatachalam-ospf-traffic-00.txt, > draft-dharanikota-interarea-te-ext-00.txt. > > This does not completely solve the problem either. For intra-area tunnels, > LSP constraints are user-configured and thus only known to the Ingress LSR. > For inter-area LSPs, the LSP constraints have to be signaled to the transit > ABRs along the path, requiring extensions to RSVP-TE or CR-LDP. > > regards, > Louis begin:vcard n:Dimitri;Papadimitriou Dimitri tel;home:+32 2 3434361 tel;work:+32 3 2408491 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.alcatel.com org:Alcatel Bell;IPO NA (NSG) - Antwerpen version:2.1 email;internet:dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be title:Optical Networking R&S - Senior Engineer adr;quoted-printable:;;Francis Wellesplein, 1=0D=0AB-2018 Antwerpen;;;;BELGIUM fn:Papadimitriou Dimitri end:vcard |
|