The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Feb> msg00026



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

non-RSVP routers.

  • From: "Gopinath G - CTD, Chennai." <gopinathg@ctd.hcltech.com>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 12:25:28 +0530

Title: RE: non-RSVP routers.
Hello
  
  Section 3.7 (Link Capability/Resources)  of   www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bitar-rao-ospf-diffserv-mpls-01.txt
specifies bits for cr-ldp,rsvp-te etc .. signifies the protocol is enable/disable for that link.  
 
Does OSPF will advertise the same if the Diffserv through MPLS is disable and rsvp-te/cr-ldp is enabled ?
 
 
gopinathg
-----Original Message-----
From: Ashwin C. Prabhu [mailto:Ashwinp@in.huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:36 AM
To: Gopinath G - CTD, Chennai.; mpls@UU.NET
Subject: RE: non-RSVP routers.


Hi

 I don't think IGP LSA's have any such field which
 tells signalling protocol is enabled or not.
 ( Note that it can even be LDP not necessarly RSVPTE )

Ashwin


-----Original Message-----
From: Gopinath G - CTD, Chennai. [mailto:gopinathg@ctd.hcltech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:40 AM
To: mpls@UU.NET
Subject: RE: non-RSVP routers.


Hello,


    I hope LSA's of IGP may help to find the next hop is RSVP capable or
not...

pls corect me  if I am wrong

gopinathg


-----Original Message-----
From: schultz@io.iol.unh.edu [mailto:schultz@io.iol.unh.edu]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 11:53 PM
To: Subhakar K S
Cc: mpls@UU.NET
Subject: Re: non-RSVP routers.



Hello,

Please see the last paragraph in RFC 2205, section 3.8:

"With normal IP forwarding, RSVP can detect a non-RSVP hop by comparing
the IP TTL with which a Path message is sent to the TTL with which it is
received; for this purpose, the transmission TTL is placed in the common
header.  However, the TTL is not always a reliable indicator of non-RSVP
hops, and other means must sometimes be used.  For example, if the routing
protocol uses IP encapsulating tunnels, then the routing protocol must
inform RSVP when non-RSVP hops are included.  If no automatic mechanism
will work, manual configuration will be required."

However, RSVP-TE will not work with non-RSVP routers.  Please see section
4.2.5 of RFC 3209.

Thanks,
-Ben

On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Subhakar K S wrote:

>
> How does an intermediate router finds if its
> downstream router is RSVP aware or not.
>
>
> thanks,
> S.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!
> http://auctions.yahoo.com
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
originator of the message.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority,
states them to be the views of Huawei Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.