The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Last call on LSP Ping
In message <4B6D09F3B826D411A67300D0B706EFDEB03BBD@nt-exch-yow.pmc-sierra.bc.ca >, Shahram Davari writes: > Curtis, > > > > > > > My interpretation is push both labels. Both start at TTL=1. > > > > Increment top, then next label. If they both terminate > > at the same > > > > egress LSR (normal for BGP VPN) then bottom TTL never gets past 1. > > > > > > What do you do for pinging the inner LSP? > > > > For ping mode, set all the labels that you want tested to TTL=255 and > > send. If there are any hops after the top, the packet gets delivered > > to the egress of the label you want tested. > > > > Did you mean traceroute? > > > No I meant ping. But I am not satisfied with your answer. Let's assume > we have a PWE3 connection, and the user packets are sent with 2 labels (A & B > ). > Label A is the PW label and label B is the transport label. The egress LSR ch > ecks the transport label and terminates it and forwards the packet based on t > he > PW label. It never checks the S-bit. If LSP-ping has the same label stack (A& > B) > then the LSP-ping will be delivered to the customer. Don't you think so? That would happen and it would not be a good thing. For a VPN the customer would get a null label packet with MPLS ping payload. For PW, there would be junk and a framing error at some level. > If the LSR at TTL=4 swaps label X for Y it > > puts Y in the Downstream Mapping TLV in the echo reply. T > > Here is my point. How do you put the Downstream mapping TLV in the > RESV message if the return path is via control-plane? Good point. You can't. For some reason I thought there was a place for TLVs in this object. Looks like you can just confirm that the packet reached a router at TTL=x and how long it took. My guess on why this is so is the RSVP object size is too limited to carry a full set of MPLS-ping TLVs. The more I look at "reply via the control plane", the less useful it looks. Perhaps one of the authors can tell us why we can't just drop it. > -Shahram Curtis
|
|