The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] a step towards consensus on mpls signaling protocol
>> - There is a clear majority for discontinuing work on CR-LDP. >> However, there is no IETF process to "de-standardize" an existing >> proposed standard that would apply in this situation. Thus >> CR-LDP will remain a proposed standard. Send it to historic, a la RFC 3166/3167, or someone will make me implement it. >> To this end: >> >> - Existing WG drafts related to or updating/changing CR-LDP will >> be progressed according to normal procedures. >> >> - the Working Group will take on no new WG documents related to >> CR-LDP. >> >> - A message will be sent to the relevant standards organizations >> notifying them of this change of focus on MPLS signaling protocols. Again, can we send it to historic or is there some procedural (or other reason) not to do this? Dave
|
|