The MPLS WG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]
Encapsulating MPLS in IP or GRE
-
From: Mark Duffy <mduffy@quarrytech.com>
-
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:00:56 -0400
-
Cc: "Loa Andersson" <loa.andersson@utfors.se>, "George Swallow" <swallow@cisco.com>
ditto.
--Mark
P.S. Is it reasonable to expect that an IP protocol number (or two, including multicast) will be allocated for this purpose? Just how popular does a protocol need to be to merit one of these?
At 06:15 PM 8/15/02 -0400, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>>>>
I agree that this should be a standards track document.
Cheers,
Andy
------
At 8/14/2002 09:47 AM -0700, Eric Rosen wrote:
In support of work going on in PPVPN and PWE3, it is desirable to have some
standards for encapsulating MPLS packets inside IP packets. The draft whose
announcement I attach below is the result of merging two previous (but
expired) documents, draft-worster-mpls-in-ip, and draft-rekhter-mpls-over-
gre. I would like to present this for the consideration of the MPLS WG as a
standards track document.
Title : Encapsulating MPLS in IP or GRE
Author(s) : T. Worster, Y. Rekhter, E. Rosen
Filename : draft-rosen-mpls-in-ip-or-gre-00.txt
Pages : 7
Date : 13-Aug-02
<<<<
| |
|