The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Aug> msg00063



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Comments on Fast Reroute draft

  • From: Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 11:16:03 -0700
  • Cc: "'mpls@UU.net'" <mpls@UU.NET>

Ping,

draft-vasseur-mpls-backup-computation-00.txt is also proposing
non-local bypass tunnel computation. Has this draft also been rejected?

-Shahram



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ping Pan [mailto:pingpan@cs.columbia.edu]
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:12 PM
> To: Shahram Davari
> Cc: 'mpls@UU.net'
> Subject: Re: Comments on Fast Reroute draft
> 
> 
> Shahram Davari wrote:
> 
> > Ping,
> > 
> >>The ingress does not need to compute the bypass tunnel. 
> Bypass tunnel 
> >>computation could be a local decision.
> >>
> >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-fastrerout
> >>
> > e-mib-00.txt
> > 
> > 
> > But it may also be a non-local decision.
> > 
> > -Shahram
> > 
> 
> 
> I think MPLS WG had gone through this argument before (there 
> was a draft 
> on this). I recall nobody wanted it. The question was why. 
> Also are we 
> going to design a RSVP fragmentation extension to support large 
> messages? ;-)
> 
> - Ping
> 
> 
> 
>