The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2002-Aug> msg00062



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Comments on Fast Reroute draft

  • From: Ping Pan <pingpan@cs.columbia.edu>
  • Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 11:12:18 -0700
  • CC: "'mpls@UU.net'" <mpls@UU.NET>
  • User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3

Shahram Davari wrote:

> Ping,
> 
>>The ingress does not need to compute the bypass tunnel. Bypass tunnel 
>>computation could be a local decision.
>>
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-fastrerout
>>
> e-mib-00.txt
> 
> 
> But it may also be a non-local decision.
> 
> -Shahram
> 


I think MPLS WG had gone through this argument before (there was a draft 
on this). I recall nobody wanted it. The question was why. Also are we 
going to design a RSVP fragmentation extension to support large 
messages? ;-)

- Ping