The MPLS WG Archive

[gmpls gmpls <thinkgmpls@yahoo.com>]

Thanks Zhi for ur clarification.
This has led to another question
Is optical network providing service other than UNI
clients. If not, why do we have to provide other style
of reservation, which is not going to used at all?

Regards



--- Zhi-Wei Lin <zwlin@lucent.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This implication doesn't necessary apply. What the
> UNI requests requires 
> that the network be able to support. But this
> doesn't necessarily imply 
> that what UNI has translates to what the network
> must also have and no 
> more...
> 
> The SE style discussion is orthogonal to this...
> 
> Zhi
> 
> 
> gmpls gmpls wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >I need some more clarification on this regard.
> >The OIF UNI v1.0 standard says UNI only supports
> the
> >FF style of reservation. Since Optical network
> which
> >main purpose is to provide service for UNI clients,
> >would  have to support same set reservation styles
> >which UNI needs.
> >
> >So Is there a need for supporting SE style of
> >reservation in the optical domain?
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
> >http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> >
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/