The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] question on e-lsp and l-lsp
----- Original Message ----- From: "Vishal M" <vishal_study@yahoo.com> To: "Yongjun Im" <yongjuni@erlangtech.com> Cc: <mpls@uu.net> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:28 PM Subject: Re: question on e-lsp and l-lsp > > > > > 1. Can we map multiple CTs onto a single L-LSP ? > > The > > > draft seem to suggest that creation of a separate > > LSP > > > can be done for every CT. > > > > What is CT? > > ...I apologize...CT stands for Class Type... > So can we map multiple Class Types onto a single > L-LSP ? In order to map multiple class types to LSP, the class type should be mapped into EXP fileld in a shim header. That is the definition of E-LSP. In case of L-LSP, the only class identifier available to an LSR is a label value. That is the definition of L-LSP. > > Thanks, > Vishal. > > > > > > > Is creation of separate L-LSP mandatory for every > > CT > > > or is it left to the implementation? > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Find a job, post your resume. > http://careers.yahoo.com > |
|