The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] question on e-lsp and l-lsp
Hi, I have some followup questions on L-LSP and E-LSPs: 1. Can we map multiple CTs onto a single L-LSP ? The draft seem to suggest that creation of a separate LSP can be done for every CT. Is creation of separate L-LSP mandatory for every CT or is it left to the implementation? 2. Somewhere I read that E-LSP shouldn't be used for ATM-LSR. Could someone please explain why ? Thanks for your time, Vishal. "Fan, Zhong" wrote: > > Can anybody shed some light on the differences between e-lsp and > l-lsp please? I'm reading draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext-09.txt at the > moment. Although the draft gives denifition of these two kinds of > LSPs, I am still confused. Is this all about the mapping of diffserv > classes to MPLS FEC or EXP? The draft explains the differences. In superbrief summary; - An L-LSP has one QoS for all packets. It is determined at LSP setup. This is similar to setting up an LSP without any DiffServ extensions, except that the objects used in the signaling are different. - An E-LSP has up to 8 QoS levels for the single LSP. The EXP bits determine the appropriate QoS on a per-packet basis. The QoS that is assigned to each EXP value is signaled at LSP setup (or is a configured default if the values are not signaled.) -- David __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com
|
|