The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Oct> msg00405



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

RSVP rro QUESTIONS, can anyone help me for this?

  • From: David Charlap <David.Charlap@marconi.com>
  • Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:50:16 -0400

Hong Liao wrote:
> 
> On section 4.4 Record route object:
> ..................
> 
> [ If a path message contains multiple RROs, only the first RRO is
> maningful.  Subsequent RROs should be ignored and should not be
> propagated.
> Similary, if in a Resv MESSAGE MULIPLE RROs are encountered
> following a FILTER_SPEC before another Filter is encountered, only
> the first RRO is meaningful.  Subsequent RROs should be ignored and
> SHOULD NOT be propagated

Does this really require any further explanation?

> So here the multiple RROs, the order should be as is: 1st RRO is 1st,
> and 2nd RRO is 2nd,RRO as a whole.

Of course.  The first one appearing in the message is first.  It would
take an incredible twist of understanding to assume that the draft means
"last" when it says "first".

> As I observed, the one vendor will forward the second RRO if there
> are 2 RROs object existing in the path msg or resv msg.

Then this vendor has a broken implementation.  Have you informed them of
their bug?  They should fix it.

-- David