The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Doubt in draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-07.txt MIB
Title: Doubt in draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-07.txt MIB Hello
Abhay
Thanks for your
reply.
But still i am not
clear.
There is one more entry in the
tunnel table. fastReroute under the mplsTunnelSessionAttributes
as follows
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
mplsTunnelSessionAttributes
OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX BITS { fastReroute (0), mergingPermitted (1), isPersistent (2), isPinned (3), recordRoute(4) } MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This bitmask indicates optional session values for this tunnel. The following describes these bitfields: fastRerouteThis flag indicates that the any tunnel hop may choose to reroute this tunnel without tearing it down. This flag permits transit routers to use a local repair mechanism which may result in violation of the explicit routing of this tunnel. When a fault is detected on an adjacent downstream link or node, a transit router can reroute traffic for fast service restoration. REFERENCE "1. RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, Awduche et al, Internet Draft <draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp- lsp-tunnel-07.txt>, August 2000." DEFVAL { 0 } ::= { mplsTunnelEntry 13 } I think the flag you were talking about is the
above one and not the mplsTunnelLocalProtectInUse.
Please tell me if i am wrong.
I am still not clear about mplsTunnelLocalProtectInUse flag what it is ment for ? According to my
understanding this flag shold be set only when
the local protection is in use ? And if this is what is
the purpose then it should be read-only and not
read-create.
Best
Regds,
Ashwin
|
|