The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Nov> msg00211



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Three RSVP-TE specific questions.

  • From: Haseeb Budhani <haseeb@ipinfusion.com>
  • Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 00:50:23 -0800
  • Organization: IP Infusion Inc.
  • User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1

Hello folks,

I'd like to get help on the following three issues:

1. Is it possible to have different types of subojects -- IPv6 and IPv4 
-- in an ERO object ?? In case I missed it, the draft doesnt allow or 
explicitly forbid this ...

2. If local repair is in place, doesnt that basically counter the whole 
idea of having explicit routes ?? If CSPF or some other parallel 
mechanism is in place, when would one want to employ local repair ??

3. It would seem unlikely that a label subobject be present in the Route 
Record Object in a Path message. If there is a label subobject in a Path 
message, should this be flagged an error ??

Any/all help will be greatly appreciated.

-- 
Haseeb Budhani.