The MPLS WG Archive

[Nabil Seddigh <nseddigh@tropicnetworks.com>]

Yakov

For the simple example below, based on your proposal what would
the ERO look like?

Thanks
Nabil Seddigh

> > The proposed change is not quite clearly stated. Can you please
> > restate in more precise language. Is it possible to put a diagram
> > in the draft? E.g if we have nodes A,B,C,D with unnumbered i/f
> > 1-6 (I have made them distict for ease of illustration):
> >
> >       1       2   3          4   5      6
> >     A --------- B ------------ C -------- D
> >
> > The language in Section 6 of the unnum-02 draft would appear to
> > mandate an unnumbered ERO as follows: A1,B3,C5
> >
> > What are you proposing to change it to?
> > Is it B1,C3,D5?
> 
> Certainly not, as I am proposing that "The Interface ID is the interface
> identifier assigned to the interface by the LSR specified by the router ID."
>