The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] EXP<=>PHBID maps in DIFFSERV Object
Vishal: The mappings you mentioned in your message is per LSP, not per LSR. So, for every LSP the mapping could be different. The inconsistency between the LSRs is not an issue here. When these mappings are not signalled, a default mapping is used per LSR. The draft states that, unless configured otherwise by the operator, the default mapping is that all EXP values refer to Best effort service. The inconsistency between LSRs is an issue only when the mappings are not signalled and default per LSR mappings are inconsistent among the LSRs in a domain. Regards, --Sami > -----Original Message----- > From: Vishal M [mailto:vishal_study@yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:04 PM > To: mpls@UU.NET > Subject: EXP<=>PHBID maps in DIFFSERV Object > > > > Hello, > > The DIFFSERV Object defined in "MPLS Support for > DiffServ, version 09.txt", Section 5.2 defines MAP > sub-fields that carries EXP <==> PHBID mappings for a > given LSP. > > Are these mappings specified anywhere ? What EXP value > would map to what PHBID ? > > Is it network administrator's responsibility for > guarantee the uniqueness/consistancy of such mappings > ? > > Consider the following: > > ----LSR1 ----> LSR 2 <----- LSR3----- > > LSR1 advertises EXP 4 ==> PHB AF12 map to LSR2 > LSR3 advertises EXP 4 ==> PHB CS2 map to LSR2 > > How would LSR 2 handle these ? > > Only way one could guarantee this is if the LSP is > within a particular domain, in which case consistency > can be guaranteed (by a single network admin). > > But if LSP is crossing domain boundaries, it could be > an issue. Not sure if network operators are really > into these inter-domain LSPs at this point... > > Could someone please comment on this. > > Thanks, > Vishal. > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Find a job, post your resume. > http://careers.yahoo.com >
|
|