The MPLS WG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]
Valid Race Condition related to draft "draft-ietf-mpls-crlsp -modify-03.txt"
-
From: "Sharma, Prem" <p_sharma@trillium.com>
-
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 19:56:41 -0800
Title: RE: Valid Race Condition related to draft "draft-ietf-mpls-crlsp-modify-03.txt"
Hi
Don,
But what about the cases when you have loose
hops in the explicit routes and route pinning is not requested? Can
there be a scenario where the arrival of a next hop change trigger (for a
loosely routed hop), while the original LSP is being re-routed, may potentially
lead to race condition?
Thanks.
Prem
-----Original Message----- From: Don Fedyk
[mailto:dwfedyk@nortelnetworks.com] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 6:12
AM To: manoj juneja; mpls@UU.NET Cc: gash@att.com; Peter
Ashwood-Smith; Bilel Jamoussi; fedyk@nortelnetworks.com;
skalecki@nortelnetworks.com; lili@ss8networks.com;
ylee@irislabs.com Subject: RE: Valid Race Condition related to draft
"draft-ietf-mpls-crlsp -modify-03.txt"
Manoj
Usually the path modification is for TE LSP that are routed
via an Explicit route. This means that they are not affected by next hop
changes in IP routing. If the existing path is torn down due to a failure on
the path then you have a couple of options.
1. Abort any modification and treat as a normal
failure. 2. Handle the path release but wait for the
new modification path in hope that it will still be valid.
We have built 1. in the past. 2. is more difficult and a low
percentage success rate.
Don
> -----Original Message----- >
From: manoj juneja [mailto:manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 6:06 PM > To: mpls@UU.NET > Cc: gash@att.com;
Ashwood-Smith, Peter [CAR:CS0I:EXCH]; > Jamoussi,
Bilel > [BL60:2868-M:EXCH];
fedyk@nortelnetworks.com; >
skalecki@nortelnetworks.com; lili@ss8networks.com; ylee@irislabs.com
> Subject: Valid Race Condition related to draft
> "draft-ietf-mpls-crlsp-modify-03.txt" > > > Hi
All, > > Please comment on the following :
> > If the LSP
modification is in progress and in the meantime the > next hop for the same LSP changes then should the
modification > procedure be aborted ?
> > Regards, > manoj. > >
> > >
_________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com >
>
|