The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] LSR-MIB Question
Eric, Does this mean that a transmitted MPLS packet will update only one outsegment? (no multicast) -Shahram > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Gray [mailto:eric.gray@sandburst.com] > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 12:29 PM > To: Vincent Hamrick > Cc: 'Vipul Sharma'; naderv@msn.com; mpls@UU.NET > Subject: Re: LSR-MIB Question > > > Vincent, > > Think about it this way: a (set of) label(s) on an inSegment map > reliably to a specific label stack manipulation (pop, swap, push, > shake, rattle and/or roll) for any given LSP. > > -- > Eric Gray > > You wrote: > > > What if you replace the top label and then push another > label? Against > > which label would you store the outSegment counts? Or > would you store them > > against both labels? > > > > Thanks, > > -V > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On Behalf Of Vipul > > Sharma > > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 8:03 PM > > To: naderv@msn.com > > Cc: mpls@UU.NET > > Subject: RE: LSR-MIB Question > > > > Shahram, > > I had run into similar question a while > ago...Attached is the info. which > > will help you for 1. > > My feeling is that since there is no error conditions maybe > they need to be > > collected in mplsInSegmentDiscards. But that is just what I > beleive maybe > > the gurus have a differing opinion. > > For 2, I believe that we are reqd. to keep 2 sets of stats > one for the > > swapped label and one for the pushed label > > Thanx, > > Vip > > vsharma@ieee.org > > > > Attached message > > ================================================================= > > > > > In the MPLS MIBs (MPLS TE , MPLS LSR MIBs)I see > stats for errored > > > packets. > > >For e.g. in the MPLS LSR MIB there is mplsInSegmentErrors > which is "The > > >number of errored packets received on this segment." > > > My question is what type of errors make these > packets errored > > packets > > >because most errored packets are dropped at the physical > interface iteself > > >by the chips (my understanding). So does this stats put a > req. to run the > > >phy. interface device in promiscous mode? > > > > Basically any case where a labeled packet is received and > > cannot be forwarded by the MPLS software. There are many cases: > > out of bandwidth in the switching fabric, illegal labels in the > > packet, etc... > > > > --Tom > > > > >Vip > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On Behalf > Of S. Davari > > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 6:42 PM > > To: mpls@UU.NET > > Subject: LSR-MIB Question > > > > Hi All, > > > > A few questions regarding LSR-MIB: > > > > 1) If TTL expires in an MPLS packet is the packet > > counted in > > mplsInSegmentErrors" or not? > > > > 2) If we receive a labeled packet and swap the label > > and then push a new label > > do we keep 2 sets of statistics on the outgoing > > segment, one for the swapped > > label and one for the pushed label or only one? > > > > BTW, I also noticed that in LSR-MIB a swap consists of > > a pop on incoming segment followed > > by a push on outgoing segment, this is odd !! The > > odder thing is that the incoming segment has > > a parameter called InSegmentNpop in which "N" > > identifies the number of pops to be performed on the > > insegment. How does one know in advance how many pops > > to perform? If you know that, then it means > > that all those labels that you pop are not used at > > all. > > > > Thanks, > > -Shahram > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca >
|
|