The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] LSP utilization
Hi Ray, What you are describing is in fact very true. In can be caused by nature of Internet or even by geographic/time zone characteristics of your users. That was also the reason why some providers has requested the ability to dynamically redimention the configured LSPs (just build a new one with a adjusted bw). Now this new bw value is taken from the averaged real traffic rates flowing via such an LSPs. I don't think such an ability requires an IETF draft as the solution to address this is pretty simple, is contained within a router itself and can be enabled by just one knob. R. > Raymond Law wrote: > > For example, once an MPLS solution is deployed after a pre-deployment > analysis or simulation which found an optimal LSP setup in which all LSPs > have 50% utilization. If some LSPs have 80% utilization whereas other LSPs > have 30% utilization in deployment. > > Or, due to the dynamic nature of Internet traffic, some LSPs become > congested while other LSPs are underutilized. Maybe a LSP setup > specifically for best effort traffic experience a large amount of traffic > during the busy hours and that LSP become overutilized. > > Does any drafts address this problem or has any solution been attempted or > proposed in dealing with this issue? > > Thanks. > Ray, > > At 06:54 PM 7/28/01 -0400, you wrote: > >On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 04:02:37PM -0400, Raymond Law wrote: > > > So has anyone looked into increasing the efficiency of LSP usage in a MPLS > > > domain or is there any solution already out there? > > > > > > >Define "efficient". Then we can start talking about what the problem > >may be, whether it needs to be solved, and how to solve it. > > > > > > > >eric > > > > > Thanks. > > > Ray, > > > > > > At 03:58 PM 7/28/01 -0400, you wrote: > > > > > > >Of course there is. It's called 'real world'. > > > > > > > >TE is a tool, but not everything in the world (or anywhere near to > > that) is > > > >always TE'ed. > > > > > > > >Any notion that MPLS LSP utilization is always efficient is ridiculous. > > > > > > > >On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 03:51:08PM -0400, Raymond Law wrote: > > > > > What is the utilization of LSPs in a real MPLS domain? It seems > > that the > > > > > LSP utilization should be efficient since the LSPs are configured > > as such > > > > > by traffic analysis and administrative means. Is there a situation in > > > > > which a LSP is overutilized and another LSP may be underutilized? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > Ray, > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > >Christian Kuhtz <ck@arch.bellsouth.net> -wk, <ck@gnu.org> -hm > > > >Sr. Architect, Engineering & Architecture, BellSouth.net, Atlanta, GA, > > U.S. > > > >"I speak for myself only.""
|
|