The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] LDP - question about partially setup LSPs
Olle Pers wrote: [snip] > * Your second point is key. How can you know that the > * destination address in the packet is an IGP prefix? > * I suspect that many networks will want to run BGP > * edge-to-edge, but to have only IGP routes in the core. > * > The IGP knew the prefix, and B had sent out a label mapping > for it. That was the scenario in David's question. > So the router B knows how to forward unlabeled packets with this prefix. And > it did send out a label mapping for exactly the same prefix, knowing that it > didn't have any corresponding downstream label yet. Why? I don't want to > think B did that just in order to drop these packets. Yes, that is the situation in David's question. However, as I see it the problem with allowing the router to attempt to forward the packet unlabelled is that it will work in some situations and not in others - so it is difficult to debug. I have already seen one situation where a router was forwarding traceroutes happily along a "broken" LSP (and forwarding the packet as IP from the point where the LSP broke onwards) but was unable to forward MPLS VPN traffic. A similar result would have occurred with Internet traffic being forwarded over a BGP-less MPLS core. > * In addition to this you have the issue of MPLS VPN and Layer > * 2 over MPLS traffic. Either one of these will generate a > * label stack in which the innermost label is assigned edge-to- > * edge and is not visible to the intermediate devices. > * > These applications require that there exists an edge-to-edge LSP which can > be used as a tunnel. We cannot assume them to work, before the setup of this > LSP is completed. And with unordered control, the ingress will not know when > this has happened. > > But why use unordered control at all, if it leads to problems? What's the > application? My understanding of ordered control is that it leads to longer convergence times than unordered/independent control? If the application is layer 2 circuit emulation one would hope to have convergence times which are similar to those that can be achieved with native layer 2 techniques (such as PNNI.) Giles -- =================================================== Giles Heron - IP Architect - Level 3 Communications phone: +44 20 7864 0719 mobile: +44 7880 506185 ===================================================
|
|