The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Jan> msg00063



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Some queries

  • From: "dave o'leary" <doleary@juniper.net>
  • Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 10:34:06 -0800

At 09:33 PM 1/6/01 -0800, Manohar Ellanti wrote:
>Do you mean to say SPs such as large/national ISPs use ATMs on the backbone
>and have complete mesh with DS3/OC-3/OC-12 links and then allow routers etc
>connected to these ATMs switches  to have mesh connectivity as well between
>all POPs using sub-interfaces or different physical interfaces. I would
>think they use core routers to build the backbone rather than ATM switches.

ATM in the some of the larger backbones was common throughout the mid-late 
90's,
and still remains in some of the networks - but due to some of the reasons 
discussed
on this thread, many are planning to migrate to routers/LSRs interconnected 
with
SONET/SDH links and no ATM switches (or encapsulation), using MPLS to
more or less replicate the traffic engineering capabilities of ATM between 
routers -
I believe this is where this thread started, right?

                                                 dave


  • Follow-Ups: