The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Encoding of MPLS label in MP-REACH-NLRI question
> Barring objection, I will change this to: > > The Label field carries one or more labels (that corresponds > to the stack of labels [MPLS-ENCAPS]). Each label is encoded > as 3 octets, where the high-order 20 bits contain the label > value, the following three bits must be zero, and the low > order bit contains "Bottom of Stack" (as defined in > [MPLS-ENCAPS]). > > and reissue the draft. Eric, I can only assume you knew this was coming, so I'll get right to the point. First, let's briefly review some recent posts: -------- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:17:46 EST From: Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com> Subject: Re: Concerns regarding the numerous layer violations... ... The goal was just to make the stuff useful, not to achieve a political goal or to maintain a level of architectural purity. ... -------- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:47:45 EST From: Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com> Subject: Re: Concerns regarding the numerous layer violations... ... No one wanted to make a career of re-editing and re-organizing the documents, and then having to obtain a new WG consensus around the new organization. ... -------- Why is it now ok to edit and reissue the draft? I won't even speculate, I believe it's clearly obvious. Though I don't have strong feelings either way about this change, I believe the inconsistency in your willingness to cooperate should be observed. -danny
|
|