The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Feb> msg00370



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Expanded ERO draft

  • From: Bora Akyol <akyol@pluris.com>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:08:39 -0800
  • Cc: akyol@pluris.com, eric.gray@sandburst.com, mpls@UU.NET, vkompella@JasmineNetworks.com, yakov@juniper.net

You know my answer already, I think adding the router ID simplifies 
code, and is much clearer.

It is 4 bytes.

Bora



At 2:24 PM -0800 2/27/01, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>  > Or alternately, one can add the router ID to the unnumbered ERO to
>>  remove any ambiguities and also simplify fast reroute.
>
>As Yakov said, no concrete reason for adding the router ID has been
>given.  However, we've wasted enough time and bandwidth.  Let's put
>this to vote:
>
>Who all think that adding a router ID to the unnumbered ERO subobject
>would be beneficial?  A simple yes, no or don't care, please.
>
>Kireeti.