The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Feb> msg00366



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Expanded ERO draft

  • From: Yangguang Xu <xuyg@lucent.com>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:28:04 -0500
  • CC: akyol@pluris.com, eric.gray@sandburst.com, mpls@UU.NET, vkompella@JasmineNetworks.com, yakov@juniper.net
  • Organization: Lucent Technologies, Inc.

Kireeti,

Would you please tell me which one is simpler and more straight forward?

Isn't being simpler and more straight forward a concrete reason?

Yangguang

Kireeti Kompella wrote:
> 
> > Or alternately, one can add the router ID to the unnumbered ERO to
> > remove any ambiguities and also simplify fast reroute.
> 
> As Yakov said, no concrete reason for adding the router ID has been
> given.  However, we've wasted enough time and bandwidth.  Let's put
> this to vote:
> 
> Who all think that adding a router ID to the unnumbered ERO subobject
> would be beneficial?  A simple yes, no or don't care, please.
> 
> Kireeti.