The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Expanded ERO draft
Or alternately, one can add the router ID to the unnumbered ERO to remove any ambiguities and also simplify fast reroute. Bora At 4:34 PM -0500 2/27/01, Eric Gray wrote: >Kireeti, > > Thanks, and thanks to Vach as well. > > I guess the bottom line is - what Yakov said applies: >i.e. (paraphrasing) all self references refers to references >other than un-numbered interface IDs. This might be a >point that would be covered in the BCP you mentioned... > >-- >Eric Gray > >You wrote: > >> Hi Eric, >> >> > Out of curiosity, how many un-numbered interfaces can >> > B have that are known to it as interface 1? >> >> One *outgoing* interface. To clarify, in the picture below, >> the LSP goes left to right, and the interface indices are >> assigned by the LSR to the left. So, the index on the AB >> link was assigned by A. B of course also could have assigned >> an index to the BA link; if so, the value should be distinct >> from any other index assigned by B. So, the BA link could not >> (in this instance) get an index of 1. However, B could assign >> 1 to the BA link if it assigns 2 to the BC link. > > > > 1 1 1 > > A -----> B -----> C -----> D > > > > Kireeti.
|
|