The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] New TTL Draft
Hi Puneet, Thanks for your reply. Please see my comments in-line: > >2) Section 2.4 does not discuss an important case that is: > >egress processing of tunnels, i.e. pop and forwarding the > >packet as MPLS. > > Pop (or Egress Pop to distinguish from PHP) is actually > covered in section > 2.3. The possibly operation when forwarding the packet as > MPLS are covered > in the 3 bullets of section 2.4. Combine section 2.3 and the relevant > section of 2.4 and I think your concern about the missing > case should be > answered. Hence as far as I can see the case is convered, but > please let me > know if you still think that it is not addressed. > > As you know there are at least 2 distinct operations that are needed for TTL processing: 1) Determining iTTL 2) Determining oTTL Section 2.3 describes the iTTL determination for both PHP and non-PHP case. Section 2.4 however describes the oTTL determination for PHP case only. I can't see anywhere in the draft that talks about oTTL determination for non-PHP case. Do you see any? Yours, Shahram |
|