The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Dec> msg00329



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

I-D updates posted

  • From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@cisco.com>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 22:03:25 -0500
  • Cc: "'Cheenu Srinivasan'" <cheenu@paramanet.com>, mpls@UU.NET


         Thanks Ed. I forgot these myself.  The typos
should have been fixed, but we will check them out
too. I will make sure that these edits make it into
whatever else Bert wants us to change in the final
RFC version.

         --Tom


>Tom asked me to remind you guys about the following points when the MIBs
>returned from IESG review!
>
>------
>
>Hi,
>
>I've just noticed the following object in TE-MIB:
>
>mplsTunnelExcludeAllAffinity OBJECT-TYPE
>    SYNTAX        MplsTunnelAffinity
>    MAX-ACCESS    read-create
>    STATUS        current
>    DESCRIPTION
>         "A link satisfies the exclude-all constraint if and
>           only if the link contains none of the adminstrative
>           groups specifie in the constraint."
>         REFERENCE "RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP
>           Tunnels, draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-07.txt"
>    ::= { mplsTunnelEntry 29 }
>
> >From the description and the name of the corresponding field in the RSVP
>SESSION_ATTRIBUTE (LSP_TUNNEL_RA) object, shouldn't this really be called
>mplsTunnelExcludeAnyAffinity?
>
>Ed
>
>PS There also seem to be a few typos in the description - "adminstrative"
>and "specifie".
>
>------
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cheenu Srinivasan [mailto:cheenu@paramanet.com]
>Sent: 19 December 2001 18:09
>To: mpls@UU.NET
>Subject: I-D updates posted
>
>
>The following I-D updates have been posted and should appear on
>the IETF website shortly. Copies are attached to this email for
>reference.
>
>         1. draft-ietf-mpls-tc-mib-03.txt
>         2. draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-mib-08.txt
>         3. draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-08.txt
>         4. draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-04.txt
>
>All these documents are currently in IESG review and the updates
>are based on the feedback from this process.
>
>These versions of the MIBs are aligned with each other and have
>been verified to compile with smilint. (In the TC MIB you will
>need to replace the xxx in { transmission xxx } with a number
>like 166 before attempting to compile the lot.)
>
>An update to the LDP MIB I-D aligned with this version of the TC
>MIB may be posted shortly by its authors.
>
>Cheenu



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.