The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Dec> msg00273



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

MPLSOAM BOF meeting draft minutes

  • From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@workhorse.fictitious.org>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:15:12 -0500
  • cc: "'curtis@fictitious.org'" <curtis@fictitious.org>, Ping Pan <pingpan@juniper.net>, "Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALCTA" <gash@att.com>, mpls@UU.NET


In message <4B6D09F3B826D411A67300D0B706EFDE84A48D@nt-exch-yow.pmc-sierra.bc.ca
>, Shahram Davari writes:
> 
> Either I am not able to convey the fact that Ping's draft requires
> TWO DISJOINT return paths, or you pretend not to get it.
> 
> -Shahram


I'm just arguing that it is of no consequence.  You haven't
established that there is any consequence so you accuse me of not
understanding that there are return paths.

So now we understand each other.  A return paths is required for ICMP
packets.  The signaling return path is also required to work.  This is
of no consequence.

Thanks.  Over and out.

Curtis