The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Dec> msg00024



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

LDP FEC NextHop

  • From: vishal e <vishal_slj@yahoo.com>
  • Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:39:01 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc: mpls@UU.NET

Hi,
 Thanks,

 But 'nexthop' as seen by the routing table is
 immediately connected and is dynamic and could 
 change as dictated by the routing protocol. This
 cannot possibly be configured at the remote peer.
 The LDP peer is 'remote'. Also this doesn't explain
 the FEC as indicated by martini draft...

 I feel the 'nexthop' needs to be qualified, for e.g
 if this is  BGP nexthop it is actually multiple hops
 away and the FEC's immediate nexthop should not be
 considered but (E)BGP nexthop...

 Also consider the DU case where unsolicited bindings
 come in and the local LSR needs to decide which 
 binding is in effect...
Regards,
vishal.

--- Kameswara Rao Avasarala
<kameswara.rao@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>    If the next hop for 7.0.0.0/8 is not one of the
> addresses in the address
> list of the session with the targeted peer,the label
> request for the FEC
> 7.0.0.0/8 wouldn't be sent to the targeted peer .
> Kamesh,
> 
> Kameswara Rao Avasarala
> Software Engineer
> Ericsson Inc
> Telephone:
> Work:805-562-6212
> Resi: 805-562-8841
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On
> Behalf Of vishal e
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:56 PM
> To: mpls@UU.NET
> Subject: LDP FEC NextHop
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
>   Few newbie questions on FEC NextHop , LDP peer
> relation...
> 
> 
>   Suppose a non-directly connected LDP peer (address
>   list contains only 9.1.1.1/32) sends a
>   label mapping to a address FEC 7.0.0.0/8 with a
> label
>   '100'.
>   The routing table entry for 7.0.0.0/8 points
>   to a immediately connected gateway 11.1.1.1/32,
>   should one conclude that the binding is not usable
>   ( since the peer is not the nexthop for the FEC?)
> 
>   Does 'Nexthop to the FEC' mean necessarily
>   nexthop as seen by the routing table...?
> 
>   As per draft-martini 'FEC' could be a L2 VC,
>   what does 'Nexthop to FEC' mean in this case...?
>   I am guessing 'NextHop' is the 'VC-tunnel'
> endpoint..
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> -vishal
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com


  • References:
    • LDP FEC NextHop
      • From: "Kameswara Rao Avasarala" <kameswara.rao@ericsson.com>