The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Two signalling protocols (LDP & RSVP)
Ajay Simha wrote: >> >> CR-LDP has the Path-Vector TLV, which works almost identically to >> the RSVP RECORD_ROUTE object. > > Good point. But is it of consequence when one is not using > Ordered/DoD? Other modes are only for LDP, not CR-LDP. But, since you ask, they are also useful in LDP in those modes, but Path-Vector must now be used in conjunction with hop-count. Hop-count will only be non-zero for messages that come from, or are propagated from, the egress node. So... If an ingress node receives a Label Mapping where the hop-count is zero (unknown), then it the Path-Vector is not a complete path to the egress. It represents a partial path through the MPLS cloud, and may change as the LSP setup is completed. If it receives a Label Mapping where the hop-count is non-zero, then it knows that there is a path all the way to the egress, and the Path-Vector should be an accurate trace of what that path is. -- David
|
|