The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Apr> msg00561



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Two signalling protocols (LDP & RSVP)

  • From: Ajay Simha <asimha@cisco.com>
  • Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:17:14 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
  • cc: "'mpls@UU.NET'" <mpls@UU.NET>
  • X-X-Sender: asimha@uzura.cisco.com

On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, David Charlap wrote:

> mgoel@hss.hns.com wrote:
> >
> > Although both CR-LDP and RSVP-TE provides similar functionalities,
> > but one significant reason why we would like to run both the
> > protocols on the same interface can be that TE-RSVP supports IP
> > record route option using its record route objects.But CR-LDP
> > doesn't support IP record route option.
>
> CR-LDP has the Path-Vector TLV, which works almost identically to the
> RSVP RECORD_ROUTE object.

Good point.  But is it of consequence when one is not using Ordered/DoD?

-ajay
>
> -- David
>

-- 
Ajay Simha
MPLS Deployment Engineer
IOS Technology Division
(919) 392-3141

"Study as if you were to live forever
 Live as if you were to die tomorrow"

 - Mahatma Gandhi