The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2001-Apr> msg00529



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Two signalling protocols (LDP & RSVP)

  • From: Senthilkumar Rajasekharan <senthil@caip.rutgers.edu>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 12:17:01 -0400 (EDT)
  • cc: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, mpls@UU.NET

Hi,


> 
> >The above seems to be an excellent argument for running RSVP-TE.
> >It is not (as it stands) a justification for running *both* RSVP
> >and CR-LDP.
> 
> >Kireeti.
> 
> CR-LDP supports path reoptimization which means that it has the capability to
> repath loosely routed LSPs based on traffic pattern changes. But RSVP-TE does
> not support the feature of path reoptimization.

Is this your own interpretation or is there a spec which explains on how
this can be done ?? 

Further I thought both CR-LDP and RSVP-TE supported strict/loose explicit
routes. Please clarify.

-Senthil



> 
> Mohit
> 
> 
> 
> 
>