The MPLS WG Archive

["Peter Ashwood-Smith" <petera@nortelnetworks.com>]

Title: RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-bala-mplamps-00.txt]

Love the idea of a BOF but I  have an even better idea. Lets create a FORUM for it with montly meetings in Hawaii.  After all it will take ages for all our products to be mplamps compatible so these meetings would have to go on for ... years? Closed door interoperability testing would be held in some equally tropical place ;)

Cheers,

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From:   Curtis Villamizar [SMTP:curtis@avici.com]
Sent:   Thursday, September 14, 2000 9:47 AM
To:     Bala Rajagopalan
Cc:     mpls@UU.NET; routing-discussion@ietf.org
Subject:        Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-bala-mplamps-00.txt]




In message <39BE398F.F992D026@tellium.com>, Bala Rajagopalan writes:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --------------6EC2A1215DD71CBDCC0D0364
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
> I regret to bring to your attention the following draft which was
> recently
> announced. Please be warned that I might apply for a BOF slot in the
> upcoming IETF meeting to discuss this topic.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> Bala Rajagopalan




Bala,

Are you applying for the position of Foo over Lambda Switching WG
chair?  The work seems to fit in with the direction of the OIF
signaling WG.

Curtis