The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Oct> msg00515



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

FW: Question

  • From: "Paul Tasillo" <Paul.tasillo@tivoli.com>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:26:26 -0400
  • Cc: "mpls@UU. net" <mpls@UU.NET>
  • Importance: Normal

Christian-
	Its not that I'm advocating it. I'm just describing what I've read in the
drafts. Look at
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-mib-06.txt
	If you have security issues, use SNMPv3 with security and authentication.
-Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Kuhtz [mailto:ck@arch.bellsouth.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 11:15 AM
To: Paul Tasillo
Subject: Re: FW: Question


On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:09:55AM -0400, Paul Tasillo wrote:
> Paul Tasillo wrote:
> >
> > It can be signaled, but you can provision with CLI and SNMP (when the
MIBs
> > are supported). Isn't that what the drafts describe?
> > -Paul

Errr... you're advocating SNMP writes in an SP network?  Some people have
security policies expressly prohibiting that.

CLI, or whatever other methods the various vendors provide.

--
Christian Kuhtz                                     Architecture,
BellSouth.net
<ck@arch.bellsouth.net> -wk, <ck@gnu.org> -hm                       Atlanta,
GA
                                                    "Speaking for myself
only."