The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Oct> msg00468



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

VPN solution - White flag ?

  • From: "Fu, James" <jfu@sorrentonet.com>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:43:43 -0700
  • Cc: yakov@cisco.com, rnewcomb@ennovatenetowrks.com, mpls@UU.NET, diego@estos.upc.es

Title: RE: VPN solution - White flag ?

I didn't realize that these are the latest innovative IETF language trend.


James Fu 

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Rosen [mailto:erosen@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 11:43 AM
To: Paul Doolan
Cc: yakov@cisco.com; rnewcomb@ennovatenetowrks.com; mpls@UU.NET;
diego@estos.upc.es
Subject: Re: VPN solution - White flag ?



I  don't really  want  to  keep it  up  either, but  as  long as  misleading
statements are being made I feel I have to reply.

Paul> BGP ...   distributes reachability information  in the IDR  system. We
Paul> may agree or disagree on how well it scales in that application.  That
Paul> has little bearing on whether  that property applies in this different
Paul> application.

Whether  something  scales in  an  extremely  large  environment has  little
bearing on whether it scales in  a smaller environment?  I can't imagine why
anyone would make such a claim.

Paul> The scalability  of BGP is  only one of  the issues with  the protocol
Paul> which call its use in this application into question.

Now that's an example of FUD!!