The MPLS WG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]
VPN solution - White flag ?
-
From: "Fu, James" <jfu@sorrentonet.com>
-
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:43:43 -0700
-
Cc: yakov@cisco.com, rnewcomb@ennovatenetowrks.com, mpls@UU.NET, diego@estos.upc.es
Title: RE: VPN solution - White flag ?
I didn't realize that these are the latest innovative IETF language trend.
James Fu
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Rosen [mailto:erosen@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 11:43 AM
To: Paul Doolan
Cc: yakov@cisco.com; rnewcomb@ennovatenetowrks.com; mpls@UU.NET;
diego@estos.upc.es
Subject: Re: VPN solution - White flag ?
I don't really want to keep it up either, but as long as misleading
statements are being made I feel I have to reply.
Paul> BGP ... distributes reachability information in the IDR system. We
Paul> may agree or disagree on how well it scales in that application. That
Paul> has little bearing on whether that property applies in this different
Paul> application.
Whether something scales in an extremely large environment has little
bearing on whether it scales in a smaller environment? I can't imagine why
anyone would make such a claim.
Paul> The scalability of BGP is only one of the issues with the protocol
Paul> which call its use in this application into question.
Now that's an example of FUD!!
|