The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Oct> msg00446



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[IP-Optical] RE: Optical link bundling. Was Re: DraftMinutes From Pittsburgh

  • From: "Angela Chiu" <alchiu@research.att.com>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:54:30 -0400
  • Cc: <ip-optical@lists.bell-labs.com>, <mpls@UU.NET>
  • Importance: Normal

Bert,

The part that is new is that we want to automate the whole request and
routing process by using signaling protocols in the control plane. As
Kireeti pointed our earlier, current GMPLS protocols do not provide such
capability is the overlay model is used.

Regards,

Angela

-----Original Message-----
From: Manfredi, Albert E [mailto:Albert.Manfredi@PHL.Boeing.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 11:44 AM
To: 'alchiu@research.att.com'
Cc: ip-optical@lists.bell-labs.com; mpls@UU.NET
Subject: RE: [IP-Optical] RE: Optical link bundling. Was Re:
DraftMinutes From Pittsburgh


Angela Chiu wrote:

> Bert,
>
> Two disjoint links in IP layer may not be diversely routed in
> the physically
> layer, for example they could share the same fiber conduit as
> certain point
> of the routes. See our draft
> http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chiu-strand-uniqu
> e-olcp-00.txt
> for more details on this.

Of course. But if a client wants to achieve path diversity at Layer 3, for
whatever reasons of reliability, then the service provider could provide
that client with the appropriate paths to use, based on that service
provider's physical network. Nothing new to invent?

And if the service provider sets up the separate paths over separate OSPF
areas, for example, one might ensure that the paths stay physically
separate.

Bert
albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com