The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Oct> msg00366



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[IP-Optical] RE: Optical link bundling. Was Re: Draft Minutes From Pittsburgh

  • From: Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com
  • Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 17:42:47 -0500
  • CC: braja@tellium.com, darren.freeland@bt.com, ip-optical@lists.bell-labs.com, jdrake@calient.net, mpls@UU.NET, neil.2.harrison@bt.com
  • X-OpenMail-Hops: 1

I believe you will find that carriers are already working on 
requirements in T1X1 and the ITU-T.  The OIF Carrier group document 
served as a catalyst to get the requirements on paper.  That has 
triggered carrier work on requirements in T1X1 and elsewhere for 
inclusion in IETF and ITU-T documents.  We don't need another group to 
work this issue.

The best results will come from carrier/vendor interaction to develop 
acceptable requirements.

Mark Loyd Jones
Sprint
Technology Planning & Integration
913-534-5247
mark.jones@mail.sprint.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: azinin [mailto:azinin@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 6:25 PM
> To: yxue
> Cc: azinin; darren.freeland; braja; jdrake; neil.2.harrison; mpls;
> ip-optical
> Subject: Re: [IP-Optical] RE: Optical link bundling. Was Re: Draft
> Minutes From Pittsburgh
> 
> 
> 
> Yong,
> 
> Friday, October 20, 2000, 2:26 PM, Yong Xue <yxue@UU.NET> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > I think the carrier
> >  should form
> >  a group and come up with a control plane  protocol requirements
> 
> [...]
> 
> I believe such a document would be very valuable.
> 
> Alex.
> 
> 
>