The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Oct> msg00325



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[IP-Optical] RE: Optical link bundling. Was Re: Draft Minutes From Pittsburgh

  • From: darren.freeland@bt.com
  • Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:35:30 +0100
  • Cc: ip-optical@lists.bell-labs.com, mpls@UU.NET, neil.2.harrison@bt.com

Title: RE: [IP-Optical] RE: Optical link bundling. Was Re: Draft Minutes From Pittsburgh
Thanks Osama :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Osama Aboul-Magd [mailto:osama@nortelnetworks.com]
Sent: 20 October 2000 19:21
To: darren.freeland@bt.com; kireeti@juniper.net
Cc: ip-optical@lists.bell-labs.com; mpls@UU.NET; neil.2.harrison@bt.com
Subject: RE: [IP-Optical] RE: Optical link bundling. Was Re: Draft Minutes From Pittsburgh

You may also consider the draft on LDP extensions for optical UNI <draft-mpls-aboulmagd-ldp-opical-uni-00.txt.

Regards;

Osama Aboul-Magd
ASON Standards and Architecture
Nortel Networks
P.O. Box 3511, Station "C"
Ottawa, ON, Canada
K1Y - 4H7
Tel: 613-763-5827
e.mail: osama@nortelnetworks.com


> Why I ask the above question is that there is a UNI based on IP
> control protocols (draft-gray-mpls-rsvp-oif-uni-ext-00.txt), which
> caters to non-IP uses of the OTN, and whose underlying model is the
> overlay model.  This draft is in response to the *OIF*'s requirements
> for an optical UNI.

I was not aware of this ID.  Thanks.  I will have a look at it when I'm back
in the office Monday morning.