The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Oct> msg00309



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[IP-Optical] RE: Optical link bundling. Was Re: Draft Minutes FromPittsburgh

  • From: "Frank Hujber" <fhujber@hotmail.com>
  • Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 19:59:24 -0400
  • Cc: <neil.2.harrison@bt.com>, <mpls@UU.NET>, <ip-optical@lists.bell-labs.com>
  • X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2000 00:59:31.0219 (UTC) FILETIME=[55E64630:01C03BC3]
  • X-Originating-IP: [24.189.146.213]

Daren, Debjan,

Do they at least agree that the OTN _will_ be multi-client? Or do they think
that each client will own their own OTN?

Frank Hujber
fhujber@hotmail.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Debanjan Saha" <dsaha@tellium.com>
To: <darren.freeland@bt.com>
Cc: <neil.2.harrison@bt.com>; <mpls@UU.NET>;
<ip-optical@lists.bell-labs.com>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [IP-Optical] RE: Optical link bundling. Was Re: Draft Minutes
FromPittsburgh


> Darren,
>
> darren.freeland@bt.com wrote:
> >  My current thinking is that the peer model is impractical
> >  in a multi-client OTN.
>
> That's my thinking too. Clearly, there are "faithfuls" out there
> who don't agree with this view :-)
>
> Debanjan
>
>
> --
> Debanjan Saha                         Phone: 732-923-4264
> Senior Network Architect              Fax:   732-923-9804
> Tellium Optical Systems               http://www.tellium.com
>