The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Oct> msg00303



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[IP-Optical] RE: Optical link bundling. Was Re: Draft Minutes From Pittsburgh

  • From: Alex Zinin <azinin@cisco.com>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 16:25:58 -0700
  • CC: "'Yong Xue'" <yxue@UU.NET>, <darren.freeland@bt.com>, <braja@tellium.com>, <jdrake@calient.net>, <neil.2.harrison@bt.com>, <mpls@UU.NET>, <ip-optical@lists.bell-labs.com>, "'oif_carrier_group'" <oif-carrier@oiforum.com>
  • Organization: Cisco Systems


John,

Friday, October 20, 2000, 3:33 PM, John Strand <jls@research.att.com> wrote:
[...]
> (3) As Yong mentioned, a number of carriers feel that the complexity of the peer model make
>         this a high-risk initial architecture.  I think that Darren and many other people with
>         transport network experience (including me) would feel a lot more comfortable with
>         peer model proponents if more attention and respect were being given up-front to defining
>         requirements and understanding what makes optical networking different. For more on this,
>         see the I-D draft-chiu-strand-unique-OLCP. (Btw, there's a significantly revised version of
>         this available to anyone interested that reflects excellent comments from John Eaves and others.)

Can I suggest that you just publish the new version?

Thanks,

Alex.