The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [IP-Optical] RE: Optical link bundling. Was Re: Draft Minutes From Pittsburgh
Hi Alex, you observered: > So, maybe it would be more constructive if you document your assumptions, > understanding of the current situation, required functionality and > concerns you have. This would be very valuable, I guess, and would > let people express their opinion. Such a document could serve as > a basis for [hopefully] more productive discussion. > > If e-mail does not work out, I think we can always schedule a BOF-like > meeting (not necessarily at an IETF one). Face-to-face always works > better. > NH=>This activity has been ongoing in BT for some time and we are currently formulating our requirements for the OTN. We have already mentioned many of our concerns/views on the list. If complete in time for the next IETF we may try and bring something along to help shape the framework. We are also already active with other operators/vendors and working on G.ason in the ITU....which is starting with a 'requirements capture' phase for the OTN control-plane. Always willing to talk face-face. Neil |
|