The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Oct> msg00260



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[IP-Optical] RE: Optical link bundling. Was Re: Draft Minutes From Pittsburgh

  • From: neil.2.harrison@bt.com
  • Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 23:52:04 +0100
  • Cc: azinin@cisco.com, mpls@UU.NET, ip-optical@lists.bell-labs.com

John,

You wrote:
> Upon reflection, it appears that you're equating the peer model with snake
> handling
> 
	NH=> Can I suggest you go and have a chat to with those actually
responsible for P&L in operators, ie not the R&D bits....now this *is* snake
handling!  I think this may give you a good insight of the commercial
reality as to why we can't ignore the support (and not just short-term) of
various types of client networks.  Unfortunately I don't think you will hear
these people speaking on the list, so you would have to seek them out.

	I am however, somewhat surprised by the lack of operator's comments
on the list........maybe they are not tuned-in or maybe they are and don't
care (and, if so, then so be it)?

	Neil