The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Oct> msg00102



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Terminology

  • From: Grenville Armitage <gja@research.bell-labs.com>
  • Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 10:51:22 -0700
  • CC: mpls@UU.NET
  • Organization: Bell Labs Research Silicon Valley

robert,

aside from the (lack of)ethics associated with reposting
private email back to the list, please at least do me the
courtesy of taking my comments in context. quite clearly
i made a restricted observation - viz. when the LSPs are up
they essentially function as tunnels since the inside
packets are isolated from the intermediate LSRs' forwarding
machinery.

gja

Robert Raszuk wrote:
> 
> Grenville,
> 
> > on what basis an LSP is established
> > doesn't really change how it behaves
> 
> >From operational expereince with them for a decent time I see that it
> really does change how it behavies depending on how it got setup/build.
> Of course in steady state both are fine and doing the same, but when
> things start to melt or break that is when you see big differences.
> 
> R.
> 
> > Grenville Armitage wrote:
> >
> > Robert Raszuk wrote:
> >         [..]
> > > I just don't know anymore
> > > what one means by term "mpls tunnel".
> >
> > generically an LSP is always a tunnel of sorts, since the
> > IP header of the MPLS payload is thereby always hidden from
> > the intermediate LSR hops.  on what basis an LSP is established
> > doesn't really change how it behaves as a form of 'tunnel'
> > in the data path....
> >
> > gja

-- 
________________________________________________________________________
Grenville Armitage                    http://members.home.net/garmitage/
Bell Labs Research Silicon Valley


  • References: