The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Oct> msg00100



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Terminology

  • From: Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@cisco.com>
  • Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 18:03:16 -0700
  • CC: mpls@UU.NET
  • Organization: Signature: http://www.employees.org/~raszuk/sig/


Grenville,

> on what basis an LSP is established
> doesn't really change how it behaves

>From operational expereince with them for a decent time I see that it
really does change how it behavies depending on how it got setup/build.
Of course in steady state both are fine and doing the same, but when
things start to melt or break that is when you see big differences.

R.

> Grenville Armitage wrote:
> 
> Robert Raszuk wrote:
>         [..]
> > I just don't know anymore
> > what one means by term "mpls tunnel".
> 
> generically an LSP is always a tunnel of sorts, since the
> IP header of the MPLS payload is thereby always hidden from
> the intermediate LSR hops.  on what basis an LSP is established
> doesn't really change how it behaves as a form of 'tunnel'
> in the data path....
> 
> gja


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Terminology
      • From: Grenville Armitage <gja@research.bell-labs.com>
  • References: