The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Oct> msg00099



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Terminology

  • From: Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@cisco.com>
  • Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 17:50:00 -0700
  • Organization: Signature: http://www.employees.org/~raszuk/sig/


While talking to a lot of people about mpls applications (or even
watching this alias or drafts :) I see a lot of confusion about calling
different kinds of label switched paths as LSPs. The problem with this
is that all of them have very different characteristics - based on very
different control planes used to established them - with only one common
part (in the first two at least) imposed label shim(s) into ip unicast
packet.

I think about a year ago Lou presented clear separation:

* prefix based LSPs - those established based on the routes (carried by
IGPs), MP-BGP, PIM etc ...
* tunnel based LSPs - those established by extensions to RSVP or by
CR-LDP.

Now we also cold add third type:

* optical LSPs - established by MPLambda based control plane in optical
domains

I personally hate acronyms, but maybe to avoid any further confusion we
could append one letter to the LSP itself and start using P-LSP, T-LSPs
or O-LSPs to clearly indicate what we are talking about ? If somebody
has better suggestions feel free to propose. I just don't know anymore
what one means by term "mpls tunnel".

R.