The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Nov> msg00373



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Questions concerning: draft-yu-mpls-rsvp-oif-uni-00.txt

  • From: Papadimitriou Dimitri <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be>
  • Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 22:05:54 +0100

Hello,

I have some questions concerning the draft: draft-yu-mpls-rsvp-oif-uni-00.txt

The official name for ligthpath ID is now "Connection_ID", So
By refering to the draft: draft-many-carrier-framework-uni-00.txt

3.3.1 Identification Attributes

   [...]

   - connection identifier: a globally unique identifier for the
     connection.  This identifier will be assigned by the network.  The
     globally unique connection identifier will be created using a
     globally unique carrier identifier (identifying the carrier from
     which the connection request is sourced) and a carrier unique
     connection identifier.  This attribute is not modifiable (i.e.
     cannot be modified using the modify command).
 

By refering to the draft: draft-yu-mpls-rsvp-oif-uni-00.txt

3.2.4 Lightpath_ID Object
 
   The Lightpath_ID object is used to uniquely determine a lightpath
   within the optical network. Lightpath_ID object has the following
   format: 
  - IPv4 source address: This is the address (32 bits) for the source
     UNI-C who originates the lightpath.
  - IPv4 destination address: This is the address (32 bits) for the
     destination UNI-C who terminates the lightpath.
  - Ligthpath number: This is the unique identifier (64 bits) in the
     network to be associated with the lightpath.
 

Questions are the following:

I think that carrier identifier means 'optical network identifier' not the
client network (so the UNI-Client address should not be the included
within the lightpath ID) ?

Secondly i do not understand why the ONE has to assign an IP address belonging
to the signaling plane. Imagine that the address space of the signaling plane
(i.e. control plane) changes then you have to change all the identifiers of
the lightpaths (or connections) which by definitions are included within the
transport plane. This solution does not guarantee the independancy between
the signaling and the transport plane. Do you agree ?

Imagine that you may use the UNI-C as identifier, then I do not understand why
you need to include the destination UNI-C IP address within the lightpath ID.
Moreover, how do you know the relationship between UNI-C and the destination
client address (or name) ?

Regards,

Dimitri.

begin:vcard 
n:Dimitri;Papadimitriou Dimitri
tel;home:+322-3434361
tel;work:+323-2408491
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Alcatel;Corporate Research Center
adr:;;Francis Wellesplein, 1;Antwerpen;Antwerpen;B-2018;Belgium
version:2.1
email;internet:Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be
title:Telecom R&D Engineer
fn:Papadimitriou Dimitri
end:vcard