The MPLS WG Archive

[Vach Kompella <vkompella@JasmineNetworks.com>]

I guess my motivation for sending that somewhat rough
classification was to see if there was enough
good content (or at least problem identification) in
the remaining drafts, so whether *this* MPLS WG shuts
down or not, the work goes on in a new MPLS-2 WG that
has a new charter addressing those issues.

George's email is more definitive, but if you filter out
what is in or out based on that, I don't believe there is
enough to make up a WG charter yet.  Maybe that should
be an agenda item in the non-existent agenda.

-Vach

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas D. Nadeau [mailto:tnadeau@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:07 AM
To: Vach Kompella; 'mpls@uu.net'
Subject: Re: What's in or out?



         You noted that the MPLS-LSR/TE/LDP/FTN-MIBs are
no longer in the charter's scope. After reading the
revised charter, I seem to agree with you (though
not with the charter). This seems bad to me since
they were defined (and accepted by the wg) to manage
specific MPLS components. Where are things like this
going to be moved? I think that it would be a terrible
shame to loose this work, especially since there are
numerous implementations of these drafts out there
now.

         --Tom