The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext-07.txt
Francis, The targetted scenario is 2) [ two sub-clouds of a single Diff-Serv domain interconnected through an MPLS cloud ]. But I think you could make it work for 1) assuming, as you said, that you do the right DSCP translation. Francois At 10:30 25/11/2000 +0100, Francis Arts wrote: > >Hello, > >I have a question concerning the draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext-07.txt draft. > >Section 2.6.2, p.13 of this draft states the following: > >"The Pipe Model is particularly appropriate to environments in which >the incoming interface of the LSP Ingress and the outgoing interface >of the LSP Egress are in Diff-Serv domains which use a common set of >Diff-Serv service provisioning policies and PHB definitions, while >the LSP spans one (or more) Diff-Serv domain(s) which use(s) a >different set of Diff-Serv service provisioning policies and PHB >definitions." > > >This statement could be interpreted in 2 ways. Which one is correct: > >1) The 2 diff serv domains connected by the LSP use the same PHBs but >may use a different DSCP encoding of the PHB. If a different DSCP >encoding is used, a translation needs to be done at either end. > >2) The 2 diff serv domains connected by the LSP use the same PHBs and >the same >DSCP encoding of the PHB. > > > >Thanks for your answer. > >Kind regards, > > Francis. >
|
|