The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Question regarding Path state bolck in case of RSVP-TE
Gaitonde Anandprasanna wrote: > > I have read the recent draft of RSVP-TE > > but it does not discuss what should be the contents of the Path state > block. The PSB is an internal structure. Put anything in there that you think makes sense for an implementation. RFCs do not dictate your internal designs. > For RSVP RFC 2209 discuses the contents of PSB , RSB etc. RFC 2209 is an informational RFC that describes one possible implementation. You are not required to make your implementation identical to it. > Should there be any changes to the PSB and others for RSVP-TE. Probably. > I want to know whether it is implelentation dependednt or is it > standard?? The layout of purely internal data structures are never requirements. -- David
|
|