The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Information Regarding CR-LDP
You could put a FEC in (just like LDP) and route on that, but the draft says... A single FEC element MUST be included in the Label Request Message. The FEC Element SHOULD be the CR-LSP FEC Element. However, one of the other FEC elements (Type=0x01, 0x02, 0x03) defined in [1] MAY be in CR-LDP messages instead of the CR-LSP FEC Element for certain applications. Which suggests that many applications will not support this. A better approach is to use an ER TLV with a single hop loosely specifying the egress node. Regards, Adrian -- Adrian Farrel mailto:af@dataconnection.com Network Convergence Group Data Connection Ltd., Chester, UK http://www.dataconnection.com/ Tel: +44 (0) 1244 313440 Fax: +44 (0) 1244 312422 >-----Original Message----- >From: P.Nagaraju [mailto:nagarajup@internet-trends.net] >Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 2:20 PM >To: mpls@UU.NET >Subject: Information Regarding CR-LDP > > >Dear Friends, >i want information in deciding the next hop to establish a >CR-LSP when only >the resources are the constraints. Please reply me ASAP. >thanx >nagaraju > |
|