The MPLS WG Archive

["Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>]

        

Hi,

> in the lsr mib, tspec table only supports
> intserv style traffic
> parameters and thus sort of assumes that the lsp was set up using
> rsvp.
> cr-ldp has another set of traffic parameters.  shall we add
> another
> optional table, e.g., mlpsTrafficTable, that includes cr-ldp 
> traffic
> parameters or how do you want to handle this?

        

Please be
more specific as to how the cr-ldp 
parameters differ from those currently in the MIB. 
Please give specific examples.

        

> ps. why is the mib called lsr rather than mlps
> node mib, since i haven't
> found in it anything that releates to forwarding of layer 3
> packets?

        

The
LSR-MIB models how labels are swapped (among 
other things), which is why I believe that name was 
chosen. With the MIB currently in WG Last Call, I do not
believe that we will be changing its name at the 11th
hour.

        

--Tom